Page 16 - Commentator_Jul/Aug2017

GOVERNMENT LIAISON Ray Rose, 941-639-5056, esorrose@msn.com

I have attended almost every City Council meeting since Hurricane Charley in 2004 and would like to share some of my
observations:

When there are controversial agenda items, there appear to be two categories of speakers. First is the well prepared
who has reviewed the complete agenda package (agenda item, staff recommendation, backup documentation), and
presents a coherent support or opposition during their three-minute allocated time. The second category are those
responding to an e-mail or series of calls to protest (and sometimes support) the agenda item knowing little other than
the item will result in more taxes, traffic, destroy home values, or other disastrous results. They may also be convinced
that the Council or other body has made up their mind, been paid off, are stupid, or will do what they want for their good.

Suggestions for those wishing to support or oppose an issue: know the basic issue and its pros and cons; be aware of
the meeting rules, how much time you may present, whether testimony must be in person (quasi – judicial hearing) or
e-mail may be accepted; finally, know what information will be key in the decision process. If there are extenuating
circumstances, explain them and their impact. Above all, be courteous and respectful toward Council and other
presenters. Most important know when it is the designated time for citizen comments prior to Council discussion. Citizen
comments are presented at the start of various agenda sections and if you miss that time you will not have an
opportunity to speak prior to the Council action.

Unfortunately, by limiting citizen comments to a section of the agenda covering multiple agenda items, the comments
cover multiple issues and some impact seems to be lost. Apparently, this is now a standard format for all public meetings
instead of hearing public input when each agenda item opens. It also makes it more difficult when you have no indication
of Council member’s position or inclination so the input can be directed to influence their decision.

Finally, I think some residents fail to recognize the talent, commitment, and dedication of the City staff and elected
officials. The delivery of services, integrity in execution, focus on getting the job done, and availability to the public are
exemplary. I may not agree with some decisions, but have never questioned their desire to do the right thing. Is our City
government perfect? NO! But they give it their best shot, recognize opportunities to improve, and move forward.

16